IMPROVING ENGLISH PROFICIENCY AMONG AGRICULTURE STUDENTS: AN INTERVENTION USING CLT AND CLIL METHODS
Keywords:
English-speaking proficiency, agricultural education, language intervention, mixed-methods research, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of a targeted language intervention program aimed at improving English-speaking proficiency among Agriculture Diploma students at Sri Krishna Devaraya College of Agricultural Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India. Recognizing the importance of English in a globalized agricultural sector, the study addresses specific linguistic challenges faced by students from non-English speaking backgrounds. The intervention utilized a combination of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) methods, with an emphasis on interactive, context-specific language use through activities such as role-plays, group discussions, and thematic seminars. A mixed-methods research design was adopted to assess the program's impact over 12 weeks. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-intervention assessments using the Cambridge English: Preliminary (PET) test, while qualitative insights were gathered from semi-structured interviews. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in English proficiency, particularly in speaking and listening skills, with mean PET scores increasing from 58 to 72 (p < 0.05). Participants reported enhanced confidence, engagement, and perceived relevance of the language program, though challenges remained in mastering specialized agricultural vocabulary and the need for longer program duration. The findings suggest that integrating CLT and CLIL approaches can significantly enhance language learning outcomes in agricultural education. Recommendations include extending program duration, refining curriculum to address specific vocabulary needs, and incorporating continuous feedback mechanisms. This research demonstrates the value of a mixed-methods approach in capturing both measurable and experiential dimensions of language learning, offering insights for developing more effective, context-sensitive language programs in specialized fields.